Executive Boardroom | Balancing Reactivity and Proactivity in Enterprise Security
Back

Balancing Reactivity and Proactivity in Enterprise Security

Executive Boardroom - 10:35 am - 11:00 am

As with all things in life, the focus on how to conduct enterprise security ebbs and flows between varying degrees of reactivity and proactivity. In the old school Security 1.0 world, where the focus was almost completely on network security, efforts were in general proactive in nature with firewalls and anti-malware seeking to prevent threats before they even occurred. This didn't work so well and so Security 2.0 focused on reactivity, wrapping things like encryption around the data so that even if a breach occurred, the loss would be mitigated. Yet breaches, and losses, continue to occur. So if primarily proactive security doesn't work, and if primarily reactive security also doesn't work, how then do we find the right balance between the two to find a security posture that does work?

Takeaways:

  • Proactive security measures, those that prevent a threat from occurring are valuable and necessary but haven't proven effective
  • Reactive security measures, those that mitigate a threat that has occurred are also valuable but complicated a limit enterprise efficiency and efficacy
  • A new approach is needed, but is that one that blends techniques or one that finds new approaches (whether they be reactive, proactive, or both)?